Monday, November 19, 2012

CAN PEOPLE BE QUARANTINED?



Before we begin lets start with some good old definitions:

People-Human beings in general or considered collectively, mammals with free will.

Free will-The power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one's own discretion.

Quarantine-A state, period, or place of isolation

Now you ask yourself can the definitions be any more contradictory? 


The answer to this question in the same way the human spirit cannot be suppresses the human body cannot be subjected to isolation, regardless of the cost.  The only think that makes us different from other “animals is our ability to think and interact; removing this would render us like animals. (Lord of the Flies reference anyone? :) 


In essence quarantining a person is similar to killing an individual... while not physically mentally, by removing an individual from their family, loved ones, home etc. the individual will soon be rendered incapable of functioning in society, an outcast perhaps a fate even worse than death.
 If murder is banned then how can this be legal? 


After stumbling the an article on the internet I was simply applaud to find that officials in the people’s republic of china were quarantining citizens who had a disease. While initially this did not surprise me; 
The Peoples "Republic" of China is a single party state, it is a place where its citizens are constantly suppressed and denied the freedoms we take for granted in the United States. However this article has shown the true nature of the human spirit...simply imagine you being told by a "superior" that you would be forced to isolate your fellow countrymen against their will! 




The officials say that there was ample reason for the response... a case of a rare pneumonic plague killed 3 individuals and according to the government the quarantine saved lives. Or did it? Many people question the response and the response is probably best summarized by Markel (a Chinese citizen) "There may be some benefit, but we haven't measured that," he said. He noted that the response may be the result of criticism after a lax response by the Chinese government during the SARS outbreak several years ago."
LETS NOT FORGET TINNEMAN SQUARE...




 Thus is a futile attempt by the "government" of the People’s "Republic" of China to make the people less aware of the real causes: WHAT CAUSED THE DISESE AND HOW IT COULD BE PREVENTED!  Perhaps however there is a light at the end of the tunnel. If more people speak out then perhaps this type of human rights violation will not occur again.

Saturday, November 10, 2012

ANIT AMERICAN VIOLENCE IN THE MIDDLE EAST...


As many of you know as of now the United States of America is not the most beloved country in the world... As exhibited in this article "Children raised to hate America" (link to article shall be posted below) This article which is written by Matt Blake chronicles the amount of violence in the middle east that is against the United states, in the article Matt shows that it is not simply a few isolated pockets of extremists who oppose the United states but rather it is the whole middle east who opposes us! 
He uses examples and pictures to cleverly illustrate his point:











So you must be thinking who hates us? The reason is quite complex; everyone can love no country in the world. The country will always do something to offend some group. In this case the United States has indeed angered a group... and that group is Muslims. For those who do not offending Muslims is not exactly a wise choice, Muslims who practice Islam (the second largest religion in the world) make up approximately 1.62 billion people. As these statistics show-offending Muslims is not a good idea! 



Your next most immediate question will be...why do they hate US? :)
Again the answer is more than meets the eye... the United States, as most of you know the sole superpower in the world, a symbol of the west and democracy! So if a country wishes to show distain for any of these things… the United States is the easiest thing to "hate". The article speaks of the various acts of violence through the Middle East: most notably the murder of the United States ambassador to Libya. The reason for this apparently sudden outrage of hatred against the United States is in reality the explosion of pent up anger against western society in general. A film made in the United States that mocks the Islamic prophet Mohamed however sparked the incident. Think of this as the straw that finally broke the camels back.



What is the outcome? You might ask well quite simply this has strained the United States relations with the Arab world. The incident has furthered the divide between east and west. Now you might be asking who is in the wrong? Well both sides made errors, the Muslims acted wrongly by acting violently and associating the United States government with the acts of a few individuals. The United States made the error of not foreseeing the problem and limiting the exposure of the film, in addition to taking a wholly new approach to its foreign policy in the Middle East.

                                                   



ARTICLE: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2203291/Children-raised-hate-America-Shocking-picture-boy-holding-gun-anti-US-riot-Lebanon.html


SYNOPSIS OF RIOTS :


  • LEBANON - Security forces opened fire in the northeastern Lebanese city of Tripoli, killing one person after a crowd angry over the film set fire to a KFC and a Hardee's restaurant. About 25 people were wounded in the melee, including 18 policemen who were hit with stones and glass.
  • SUDAN - Several hundred protesters stormed the German Embassy in the capital, Khartoum, burning a car parked behind its gates and trash cans. Police fired tear gas, pushing the protesters outside the embassy's gates. There appeared to be no injuries to embassy staff and no apparent damage to the building. Most protesters dispersed, but a group marched to protest at the nearby British Embassy.
  • YEMEN - Security forces shot live rounds in the air and fired tear gas at a crowd of around 2,000 protesters trying to march to the U.S. Embassy in the capital, Sanaa. Police kept the crowd about a block away from the embassy. Friday's demonstration came a day after hundreds stormed the embassy compound and burned the American flag.
  • EGYPT - Riot police clashed with hundreds of protesters blocks away from the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, as the president broadcast an appeal to Muslims to protect embassies and tried to patch up strained relations with Washington. After weekly prayers, a crowd in Cairo's Tahrir Square tore up an American flag, and waved a black, Islamist flag. When protesters tried to move toward the embassy, ranks of police confronted them, firing tear gas.
  • IRAN - Thousands shouted 'Death to America' and 'Death to Israel' in Tehran in a demonstration after Friday prayers. Some burned the American and Israeli flags. State TV says similar protests were held in other Iranian cities.
  • BAHRAIN - More than 2,000 protesters chanted against the film and burned American and Israeli flags after Friday prayers in a Shiite mosque in Diraz, outside the capital, Manama. Security forces were absent, even though the area is a hotbed of opposition in Bahrain's 19-month Shiite-led uprising against the Sunni ruling system. Separately, Bahrain's Interior Ministry ordered media regulators to attempt to block access to the film clip in the Gulf kingdom.
  • IRAQ - Hundreds demonstrated in Baghdad's northern Sunni neighborhood of Azamaiyah, some shouting: 'No, no America! No, no to Israel,' and, 'We are ready to sacrifice ourselves for our Prophet.' Dozens also marched in Baghdad's Sadr City, a poor Shiite area in the capital's northeast. In the southern city of Basra, about 1,000 took to the streets and burned the American and Israeli flags. One banner said: 'Freedom doesn't mean offending two billion Muslims.'
  • TUNISIA - A crowd of several thousand demonstrators protested outside the US embassy in Tunis. Police respond to stone-throwing with tear gas. An AP reporter on the scene witnessed several people overcome by intense clouds of gas. An army helicopter flew overhead while armored vehicles protected the embassy.
  • ISRAEL - The Israeli police say about 400 people marched toward the U.S. consulate in east Jerusalem in protest over the prophet film. Demonstrators threw bottles and stones at police, who responded by firing stun grenades. Four protesters were arrested and the crowd was prevented from reaching the U.S. consulate.
  • WEST BANK - In the city of Nablus, about 200 people demonstrated against the film as Muslim clerics throughout the territory preached against it in Friday sermons.
  • SYRIA - About 200 protesters waved the Syrian flag and shouted anti-American slogans outside the long-closed U.S. Embassy in Damascus. The crowd held banners saying: 'He who curses the Prophet doesn't seek democracy' and 'a nation whose Prophet is Mohammad, would never kneel down.' The U.S. embassy has been closed since February because of the country's bloody conflict that has killed about 23,000 people.
  • AFGHANISTAN - About 1,500 protested in the eastern city of Jalalabad, shouting 'Death to America' and urged President Hamid Karzai to cut relations with the U.S.
  • PAKISTAN - Hundreds of hardline Muslims held peaceful protests against the film throughout Pakistan, shouting slogans and carrying banners criticizing the U.S. and those involved in the film. Police in Islamabad set up barricades and razor wire to prevent protesters from getting to the diplomatic enclave, where the U.S. Embassy and many other foreign missions are located. Protests were also held in Karachi, Peshawar and Lahore, where protesters shouted 'Down with America' and some burned the U.S. flag. About 200 policemen and barbed wire ringed the U.S. Consulate in Lahore.
  • GREAT BRITAIN - In London, around 250 protesters marched noisily but peacefully through Britain's capital to the U.S. embassy. The group, which called itself the 'Defenders of The Prophet,' held placards denouncing the U.S. and perceived Western imperialism.
  • TURKEY - Hundreds of people gathered in Istanbul's Beyazit Square to protest the prophet film. The protest was organized by Turkey's main Islamist political party, Saadet.
  • MALAYSIA - About 20 protesters held a peaceful demonstration outside the U.S. Embassy in the Malaysian capital, Kuala Lumpur. They briefly shouted 'Allahu akbar!' or God is great, and handed reporters a letter addressed to the American ambassador expressing anger over the movie and calling for greater respect for religions










  • Wednesday, November 7, 2012

    US ELECTION: DID THE RIGHT GUY WIN?


    No, this year I feel that the righty candidate did not win. Why you ask let me explain...
     First of all one has to simply look at the 2008 election. President Obama campaign slogan was "Change we can believe in" an excellent slogan would you not say? 





    However when one looks at the fact we will see 4 years later this is not exactly as we Americans planned... unemployment 7.9%, he promise to fix social security however nothing has been changed to stabilize they system, the president Obama promised to reduce the deficit however look at our debt it has increased since 2008 (partially due to huge spending bills), our appearance abroad has waned. In an attempt to "fix" health care (which nobody wanted) people premiums and insurance has gone up! America has certainly changed since 2008 however is this what you wanted? Yes, their are still some that say he simply needs more time! Time is a very valuable entity that cannot be simply and easily given when looking at what he has done these 4 years I do not think that the American people should have given him another!






    The time for change was indeed now I believed that America should have seen this and give Romney a chance for change... real beneficial change. However with this in mind it is the American peoples vote and thus I shall respect and honor their choice.



    Thursday, November 1, 2012

    SHOULD ONE LEAD A CHARGE OR BE PART OF IT?


    To lead or not to lead? This is the question that has been asked, I shall no offer my perspective on this very interesting question:



    Some may say that they if given the opportunity would jump at the chance to lead however I see it differently a leader should not have the mindset of rising to power but rather he should be leading! I personally believe that I would never be a subordinate to someone. While leading a group of people is no easy task it simply shows that only those who are capable can be successful in doing so!



    I feel that those who chose to follow a leader know that they chose to obey and follow that leer not simply because they find safety and comfort from the leader but rather they do so because they know that they are incapable of leader and more importantly convincing others to follow their rule!



    I conclusion I would like to answer the question very briefly: if you are a leader you would not ask your self if you should lead you would do it. You would do it because you alone have a clear and concise mindset and the drive to reach your goal. Great leaders shape history their followers are simply pawns on a chessboard.